-
Wednesday April 23, 2025 15:30
Share this page
Thaçi et al.: panel’s orders on next steps
In the course of today's status conference, Trial Panel II delivered several oral orders concerning evidence and the next phases of the proceedings. Among other things, the Panel ordered the Defence teams to submit their joint motion for the dismissal of charges in accordance with Rule 130 by 2 June 2025, or within 14 days following the Panel's last decision on the admission of evidence, whichever date is later. The response from the SPO is required to be filed by 1 July, or within 30 days subsequent to the Defence's Rule 130 motion, whichever occurs later.
Furthermore, the Victims’ Counsel is expected to be ready to present his case in July and is ordered to submit, inter alia, his list of proposed witnesses and exhibits by 28 May 2025, should the Panel find there is a case to answer.
The Panel has vacated the existing court schedule until 8 May, thereby postponing this trial until further notice.
-
Wednesday April 23, 2025 09:17
Share this page
Thaçi et al.: status conference this morning
Please be reminded about the status conference in the case against Thaçi, Veseli, Selimi and Krasniqi this morning at 10:00. As in the other cases, the streaming of this hearing will be broadcast with a delay of 45 minutes. Click here to watch the live stream in English.
-
Thursday April 17, 2025 16:30
Share this page
Specialist Chamber of the Constitutional Court Decides on Referral by Salih Mustafa
On 17 April 2025, the Specialist Chamber of the Constitutional Court delivered its judgment on the referral made by Salih Mustafa, finding that there had been no violation of the Kosovo Constitution or the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
-
Thursday April 17, 2025 15:30
Share this page
KSC Weekly Press Briefing on 17 April: transcript
Here is the transcript of today's KSC Weekly Press Briefing.
KSC Spokesperson Michael Doyle the archive of all previous press briefings is available on this page and the video files can be found on our youtube channel
-
Wednesday April 16, 2025 16:50
Share this page
Thaçi et al. (administration of justice): SPO submits amended indictment
As ordered by the Pre-Trial Judge two days ago, the SPO has today, 16 April, submitted the amended confirmed indictment in the case against Thaçi, Smakaj, Kilaj, Fazliu and Kuçi. The submission specifies that the amendments are in the paragraphs 43 and 46 in relation to counts 1 to 3.
-
Wednesday April 16, 2025 11:10
Share this page
Thaçi et al.: Defence will file dismissal of charges motions
On 16 April 2025, all Defence teams notified the Trial Panel of their intention to file motions to dismiss some or all of the charges in the indictment, in accordance with Rule 130 of the Rules. Additionally, the Defence teams indicated that they would update the Panel on whether they intend to present their cases following the ruling on the Rule 130 motions.
-
Wednesday April 16, 2025 09:06
Share this page
-
Wednesday April 16, 2025 08:45
Share this page
H. Shala: decision on latest request for temporary release available online
On 27 March 2025, Single Judge Marjorie Masselot denied a request for temporary release of Haxhi Shala to Kosovo. Judge Masselot concluded that Shala has not demonstrated the existence of exceptional and compelling humanitarian grounds justifying his temporary release. The public redacted version of this decision, filed on 15 April, is available here.
Prior to this, Shala was granted a custodial visit in October of last year, as we informed about here.
The legal framework of the Kosovo Specialist Chambers allows detained persons to make requests for a custodial visit to Kosovo when there are compelling humanitarian grounds. The relevant judges decide on any such requests, based on the information provided at the time a request is made.
-
Tuesday April 15, 2025 11:40
Share this page
Thaçi et al. (administration of justice): Additional mode of liability confirmed for Thaçi
Following the Court of Appeal’s decision we informed about earlier this month, Pre-Trial Judge Masselot yesterday, 14 April 2025, amended her previous decision confirming the indictment in this case. Judge Masselot confirmed the additional mode of liability for Hashim Thaçi under Article 32(3) of the Kosovo Criminal Code to the existing charges outlined in counts 1, 2, and 3 of the confirmed indictment and ordered the SPO to submit a new amended confirmed indictment by 16 April 2025 at 12:00.
According to Judge Masselot, a further initial appearance for Thaçi is not necessary since no new charges are added, only an additional mode of liability for the existing offense. However, the accused’s position on this should be formally recorded, she said and invited him to enter his plea regarding the newly confirmed additional form of incitement. If he chooses to do so, he must submit it in writing by 24 April at 16:00. If he decides not to exercise this right, the Pre-Trial Judge will enter a plea of not guilty on his behalf, in accordance with Rule 92(2)(f) of the Rules.
If Thaçi wishes to be informed in open court about the new mode of liability, he may submit a request for it until 24 April at 16:00.
Furthermore, Judge Masselot set the date for submitting preliminary motions by the accused in this case, if any, to 8 May 2025.
Here is the full decision.
-
Monday April 14, 2025 15:00
Share this page
Thaçi et al.: Court of Appeals decision re. Trial Panel’s witness questioning
On 11 April 2025, the Court of Appeals Chamber issued its decision dismissing the appeal filed by the Veseli ‘s and Krasniqi’s Defence. The appeal challenged a Trial Panel’s oral order from 5 December 2024, which had rejected an objection concerning the use of a statement from a non-testifying witness during the Panel’s questioning of witness Sokol Bashota.
The Appeals Panel reaffirmed the broad discretion afforded to the Trial Panel under the Rules, including the right to question witnesses on matters not raised by the parties. Among its conclusions, the Appeals Panel determined that, during its questioning, the Trial Panel was assessing the credibility or seeking clarification from a witness and that no actual prejudice had been demonstrated.
This is another decision concerning the Defence's objections about the Panel's witness questioning. We mentioned the prior two decisions in our last update.